Euro Winner Review – Free Trial – Tipster Football Tipping Service

If you’ve been looking for European football betting tips, there’s a good chance you’ve come across Euro Winner from Best Tipster.

The sales page certainly makes a big impression. It currently claims a 70.1% winning strike rate, 20.2% ROI, £33,175 profit and 11 winning months from 11. The service is run by Steve Hudson, who has been involved in football betting tips for a number of years and also operates other betting services.

But there’s a more interesting question than simply asking whether the numbers look good.

Claim your Free Trial of Euro Winner Football Tipping service here

How much of the Euro Winner track record can actually be independently checked, and what should you look at before deciding whether the service is worth following?

I’ve looked beyond the Best Tipster sales page and at the independent information currently available about Euro Winner. There are some encouraging signs, but there are also a few things that I think prospective members should understand before concentrating too heavily on the headline 70.1% figure.

What is Euro Winner?

Euro Winner is a paid football tipping service concentrating on the major European leagues.

The service covers competitions such as:

• Premier League
• La Liga
• Bundesliga
• Serie A
• Ligue 1

The recommended bets aren’t restricted to match winners either. Best Tipster says Euro Winner uses markets including 1X2, Both Teams to Score, Over/Under goals, Double Chance and Draw No Bet.

The idea is deliberately simple.

You receive the selections by email, place the recommended bets and don’t need to spend hours going through every fixture yourself.

Best Tipster says the regular tips are generally sent on Friday around 11am–12pm, with occasional midweek selections sent on Tuesdays. The service is designed around a relatively small number of bets rather than firing selections at members every day.

That last point is worth mentioning because there are plenty of football tipsters online that seem to believe more tips automatically means more value.

Euro Winner takes the opposite approach and says it concentrates on the best opportunities it identifies rather than trying to find a bet for every match.

Euro Winner results

This is where things get interesting.

The current Best Tipster sales page says the Euro Winner system has produced:

Those are very strong numbers on paper.

However, there’s an important detail that is easy to miss if you only read the headline figures.

An independent review published by Honest Betting Reviews in August 2026 reported an earlier version of the Euro Winner results as 304 bets, £30,985 profit to £100 stakes, a 69.7% strike rate and 20.4% ROI over the 2025/26 European season. It also said the service had apparently recorded a profit in all 10 months of that season.

The Best Tipster page has subsequently updated the figures to 328 bets, £33,175 profit and 11 winning months.

That’s not necessarily a problem. It appears that the service’s advertised record has simply been updated as additional testing/results were incorporated.

But it’s something I would want to see clearly explained in any proper tipster review.

A historical record should ideally remain available in its original form so people can see exactly when each selection was made, what odds were advised and how the figures changed over time.

That is considerably more useful than simply replacing last month’s headline numbers with this month’s.

Does Euro Winner stack up?

A 70% strike rate sounds fantastic.

But winning seven bets out of ten doesn’t automatically mean you’re profitable.

The odds matter.

Imagine a fictional tipster gave you ten bets at 1.30 and you won seven of them.

With £10 stakes, you’d have £70 returned from the winners but £30 lost on the three losers. You’d actually finish down £9 after staking £100.

Now imagine another tipster won only five of ten bets but the average odds were 2.20. The five winners would return £110 from £100 staked, leaving a £10 profit.

That’s why I would pay more attention to ROI, advised odds and the complete betting record than the headline strike rate.

Euro Winner’s advertised 20.2% ROI is therefore more meaningful than its 70.1% strike rate.

But there’s another question.

Can subscribers actually obtain the odds used to calculate that ROI?

This is one area where the independent review from Honest Betting Reviews is particularly useful.

That review specifically said it intended to track Euro Winner’s selections and check whether the advertised odds were realistically available to ordinary bettors.

That’s important because football odds move.

A selection might be issued at 2.00 on Friday morning and move to 1.80 by Saturday afternoon.

The match result hasn’t changed, obviously.

Your potential profit has.

If the historical record uses 2.00 but subscribers regularly have to accept 1.80, the historical ROI isn’t necessarily representative of what a new member can achieve.

This is why I’d like to see Euro Winner’s long-term results recorded with:

• Date and time of tip
• Match
• Market
• Advised odds
• Bookmaker offering those odds
• Result
• Stake
• Profit/loss
• Available odds when independently checked

That would turn a promising set of figures into a much easier record to audit.

The 5 point staking system deserves attention

Euro Winner recommends a 200-point betting bank and says its bets are generally 5 points each.

This is another part of the service that deserves more attention than it usually gets in reviews.

A “point” isn’t a fixed amount of money.

If your point is £1, a 5-point bet is £5.

If your point is £10, every selection is £50.

The percentage of your bankroll being risked is what matters.

With a 200-point bank, a 5-point bet represents 2.5% of the starting bank.

That’s not insignificant.

Ten consecutive losing bets would represent 50 points lost, or 25% of the original betting bank.

Of course, a ten-bet losing run doesn’t mean Euro Winner would necessarily experience one. It’s simply an example of why a points system shouldn’t be confused with low risk.

The Best Tipster page itself acknowledges that betting isn’t risk-free and recommends starting with small stakes. It also says the service uses a 200-point bank and 5-point bets.

Personally, this is one of the areas I’d pay more attention to than the advertised monthly profit figures.

A tipster can have a profitable record and still be uncomfortable to follow if the staking is too aggressive for your bankroll.

How much money would you actually need?

This is where the advertised £33,175 profit figure can potentially be misleading if someone doesn’t understand points.

Best Tipster gives an example suggesting that £10 per point would have produced £3,317 profit over the historical period, while £100 per point would have produced £33,175.

But that doesn’t mean someone should start with £100 stakes.

At £100 per point, a 5-point selection means risking £500.

A 200-point betting bank at £100 per point would mean a £20,000 starting betting bank.

That’s a completely different proposition from someone following the service at £1, £2 or £5 per point.

This is something I would strongly recommend prospective members understand before looking at the large profit figures in the advertising.

The percentage return is far more useful for comparing performance than the pound-profit example.

Euro Winner isn’t claiming to use just one type of football bet

Another interesting aspect of the service is the range of markets.

The main markets listed by Best Tipster are:

1X2

The traditional home win, draw or away win market.

Both Teams to Score

A bet on whether both teams will score at least once.

Over/Under Goals

Predicting whether the total goals will be above or below a particular line.

Double Chance

Backing two of the three possible match results.

Draw No Bet

Backing a team with the stake returned if the game finishes level.

This gives Euro Winner considerably more flexibility than a service that only tips match winners.

It also means that simply looking at the overall strike rate doesn’t tell us much about where the actual profit is being generated.

I’d be interested in seeing the results broken down by market.

What does Steve Hudson bring to Euro Winner?

Euro Winner isn’t being launched by someone with no previous history in football tipping.

Steve Hudson says he has been a professional tipster for 11 years and has been betting for 18 years. Best Tipster also points to his previous services, including Football Winner and AccaTipster.

That history is worth knowing about, although it shouldn’t automatically be treated as proof that Euro Winner will be profitable.

In fact, there is a useful lesson in looking at previous services.

An independent Football Winner review by Goal Profits documented an initial three-month period that produced 71.8 points profit and a 19.1% ROI. However, the same review later reported a significant deterioration in performance from May 2020 onwards, eventually describing losses of more than 100 points and downgrading the service to a “Fail.”

I’m not suggesting Football Winner and Euro Winner should be treated as the same service. They aren’t.

But the history demonstrates something important:

A strong historical record isn’t permanent.

That’s exactly why the current Euro Winner results should be tracked rather than simply accepted indefinitely.

What are other people saying about Euro Winner?

There isn’t yet a huge amount of independent discussion around Euro Winner, which makes sense given how new the service is.

Honest Betting Reviews published its initial Euro Winner review on 10 August 2026 and said it would track the selections itself, including checking the availability of the advertised odds.

There’s also a newer source worth mentioning: TipsterCheck.

At the time of research in September 2026, TipsterCheck lists Euro Winner with 8 reviews, an average rating of 4.5/5 and a Trust Score of 66.

That’s useful because it provides something different from the sales page: actual user-review information.

However, eight reviews is still a small sample.

I wouldn’t treat eight reviews as definitive proof of long-term performance, particularly for a relatively new service. It is better viewed as an early indication of customer sentiment.

That’s an important distinction.

The 30 day money back guarantee

Best Tipster currently advertises a 30 day money back guarantee for Euro Winner.

The site says customers can request a full refund during the first 30 days if they are unhappy. It also identifies ClickBank as the retailer handling the purchase.

That’s worth knowing before purchasing.

However, a refund policy shouldn’t be confused with a guarantee that the betting strategy itself will make money.

Best Tipster’s own disclaimer makes this very clear. It says earnings claims are estimates, that individual results can vary and that the testimonials shown are exceptional results rather than results guaranteed for the average purchaser.

The same disclaimer says the company cannot completely verify customer statements used in testimonials.

That’s actually an important piece of information that isn’t discussed nearly as much as the headline performance numbers.

One thing I would like to see from Euro Winner

If I could ask for one addition to the Euro Winner website, it would be a fully time-stamped public results archive.

Not screenshots.

selected winning bets.

Not just a monthly total.

Every selection.

If a tip was released at 11:15am on Friday at 2.10, I’d want that recorded permanently.

Then I’d want the result added afterwards.

That would make it possible for anybody to calculate:

• Strike rate
• ROI
• Average odds
• Maximum losing run
• Maximum drawdown
• Profit by league
• Profit by market
• Profit by month
• Profit at advised odds
• Profit at realistically available odds

That’s the sort of information that would make a tipster service much easier to assess.

Interestingly, TipsterCheck’s own methodology highlights exactly these sorts of measures. Its evaluation criteria include transparent time-stamped records, advised odds and stakes, sustained ROI, sensible staking and independent reviews.

A point about the “11 winning months”

The claim of 11 winning months out of 11 certainly looks impressive.

But there’s a statistical issue here.

Eleven months isn’t an enormous sample in betting.

Three hundred-plus bets is considerably more useful than 11 monthly figures, but even that doesn’t eliminate variance.

And there’s another thing to consider: the service has apparently been tested over the previous season and is now being marketed for the 2026/27 season.

That’s exactly the point at which the results become more interesting.

Can the approach continue working when the selections are being issued live to paying customers rather than being assessed retrospectively as a completed season?

That’s something that only time can answer.

What I like about the Euro Winner concept

There are several things that make the service interesting.

The first is simplicity.

You’re not being asked to learn a complicated trading system.

The second is that it concentrates on mainstream football markets.

The third is the relatively low frequency of selections.

And the fourth is that there is already some independent interest in the service, with Honest Betting Reviews tracking it and TipsterCheck showing early customer reviews.

The service is also relatively inexpensive compared with the size of the historical profit figures being advertised. The current Best Tipster page lists a discounted 2026/27 Season Pass and VIP Pass, with the season option covering the European league season and the VIP option adding international and cup games.

What would make me cautious?

The biggest issue isn’t that the advertised figures look too good.

It’s that they need to be independently demonstrated over time.

I’d want to know the exact odds.

I would also want to know the biggest losing run.

And I’d want to see whether the 20%+ ROI survives once the tips are followed in real time.

Those aren’t criticisms unique to Euro Winner.

They’re the questions I’d ask about virtually any paid football tipping service.

So, is Euro Winner worth trying?

That’s ultimately a decision for the individual bettor.

What can be said from the research is that Euro Winner has a clearly defined proposition, a published historical record, an established tipster behind it and some early independent coverage.

At the same time, the strongest performance figures currently associated with the service come from Best Tipster’s own published results, while independent tracking of the service is still developing. Honest Betting Reviews has explicitly said it intends to track the selections and odds, which should provide more useful evidence as the 2026/27 season progresses.

The current TipsterCheck profile is another piece of the puzzle, showing 8 reviews, a 4.5/5 rating and a Trust Score of 66 as of September 2026. That’s useful context, but still a relatively small body of feedback.

For me, the most interesting thing about Euro Winner isn’t actually the 70.1% strike rate.

It’s what happens next.

If the service can continue producing a transparent, independently trackable record at realistic bookmaker prices throughout the 2026/27 season, that will tell prospective members considerably more than another screenshot of a winning month ever could.

And that’s the part worth watching.

Euro Winner – the key facts at a glance

Service: Euro Winner
Provider: Best Tipster
Tipster: Steve Hudson
Sport: Football
Coverage: Major European leagues
Markets: 1X2, BTTS, Over/Under, Double Chance and Draw No Bet
Delivery: Primarily email
Advertised historical bets: 328
Advertised win rate: 70.1%
Advertised ROI: 20.2%
Advertised profit: £33,175
Advertised winning months: 11/11
Betting bank: 200 points
Typical stake: 5 points
Money-back period: 30 days

All performance figures above are figures published by Best Tipster and should not be interpreted as guaranteed future results. Independent tracking and real-world odds availability remain important when assessing any paid betting service.

Final word

There are plenty of football tipsters that make big claims.

The more useful question is what happens when somebody starts recording every tip, every price and every result.

That’s why Euro Winner is one I’d keep an eye on during the 2026/27 season. The historical figures are certainly interesting, but the live record will ultimately be much more informative than the sales page.

For anyone considering subscribing, I’d start small, understand the 200-point staking system, check the actual price available before placing each bet and keep your own running record.

Because in football betting, the numbers you can verify yourself are always more valuable than the numbers someone tells you to believe.